Of course.
An address is a 32-bit pattern, and any 32-bit word of main storage can hold it. For example, here is a fragment of a program:
.text
sub1: li $v0,4 # service code 4, print string
la $a0,messH # address of string to print
syscall # invoke the service
jr $ra # return to caller
.data
messH: .asciiz "Hello "
.text
sub2: li $v0,4 # service code 4, print string
la $a0,messW # address of string to print
syscall # invoke the service
jr $ra # return to caller
.data
messW: .asciiz "World\n"
.data
sub1add: .word sub1 # address of the first subroutine
sub2add: .word sub2 # address of the second subroutine
The symbolic address sub1
stands for whatever 32-bit address
the first byte of the first subroutine
gets loaded into at run time.
In the .data section
at the end
of the program,
the address represented by sub1
is stored in memory,
at the symbolic address sub1add.
Part of the job of the assembler and the loader is to determine where in memory various parts of a program go. In source code, you use symbolic addresses for these locations.
The source code interleaves text and data, but the assembler and loader will put all machine code into the text section of memory and all data into the data section of memory.
If the address of sub1 is 0x00400000,
what bit pattern do you expect to see in memory
at the location sub1add?